Editado por el Departamento de Publicaciones de la Universidad Externado de Colombia en noviembre de 2016
AARNIO, AULIS. 1997. Reason and Authority. A Treatise on the Dynamic Paradigm of Legal Dogmatics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ABBOT, D. ANDREW. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ABEL, L. RICHARD. 2003. Ideology and Community in the First Wave of Critical Legal Studies. By RICHARD W. BAUMAN. Journal of Law and Society 30(4): 601-608.
ALEXANDER, S. GREGORY. 2002. Comparing the Two Legal Realisms-American and Scandinavian. American Journal of Comparative Law 50: 131-174.
ALTHUSSER, LOUIS. 1995. Sur la reproduction. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
ALTMAN, ANDREW. 1986. Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and DWORKIN. Philosophy and Public Affairs 15: 217-244.
ANDERSON, L. DAVID. 1990. When Restraint Requires Activism: Partisan Gerrymandering and the Status Quo Ante. Stanford Law Review 42: 1549-1577.
AUBERT, VILHELM. 1963. The Structure of Legal Thinking. In Legal Essays. A Tribute to Frede Castberg on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday. 41-63. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
AUSTIN, JOHN. 1954. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
BALBUS, D. ISAAC. 1977. Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the “Relative Autonomy” of the Law. Law and Society Review 11: 571-588.
BANAKAR, REZA. 2003. Merging Law and Sociology. Beyond the Dichotomies in Socio-Legal Research. Berlin: Galda and Wich Verlag.
BARNETT, E. RANDY. 1991. Foreword: Unenumerated Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 14(3): 615-643.
BARTELSON, JENS. 2001. The Critique of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BELL, S. JOHN. 1983. Policy Arguments in Judicial Decisions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
BERMAN, J. HAROLD. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BINDREITER, U. UTA. 2000. Why Grundnorm? A Treatise on the Implications of Kelsen’s Doctrine. Lund: Juridiska fakulteten-Lunds Universitet.
BIX, BRIAN. 1993. Law, Language and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1996. Natural Law Theory. In A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Ed. D. PATTERSON, 223-240. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing.
———. 1999. H. L. A. Hart And The Hermeneutic Turn In Legal Theory. Southern Methodist University Law Review 52: 167-199.
———. 2000. On the Dividing line Between Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism. Notre Dame Law Review 75: 1613-1625.
———. 2002. Natural Law Theory: The Modern Tradition. In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy. Ed. J. COLEMAN and S. SHAPIRO, 62-103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2003. Jurisprudence. Theory and Context. 3rd edn. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
———. 2003. Law as an Autonomous Discipline. In The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies. Ed. P. CANE and M. TUSHNET, 975-987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BJARUP, JES. 1978. Skandinavischer Realismus: Hägerström – Lundstedt –Olivecrona – Ross. Munich: Karl Albert Freiburg.
———. 1986. Kelsen’s Theory of Law and Philosophy of Justice. In Essays on Kelsen. Ed. R. TUR and W. TWINING, 273-303. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1986. Legal Realism or Kelsen versus Hägerström. Rechtstheorie 9: 243-257.
———. 2003. Law and Legal Knowledge from a Realistic Perspective. In Theorie des Rechts und der Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Werner Krawietz zum 70.
Geburtstag. Ed. M. ATIENZA, E. PATTARO and M. SCHULTE, 459-483. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
BOBBIO, NORBERTO. 1969. The Promotion of Action in the Modern State. In Law, Reason, and Justice. Essays in Legal Philosophy. Ed. G. HUGHES, 189-206. New York: New York University Press.
———. 1998. Kelsen and Legal Power. In Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Ed. S. L. PAULSON and B. LITSCHEWSKI PAULSON, 435-449. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
BORK, H. ROBERT. 1990. The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Touchtone/Simon and Schuster.
BOURDIEU, PIERRE. 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal 38: 814-853.
BOYLE, JAMES. 1985. The Politics of Reason: Critical Legal Theory and Local Social Thought. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 133: 685-780.
BRINK, O. DAVID. 1985. Legal Positivism and Natural Law Reconsidered. The Monist 68: 364-387.
BRION, J. DENIS. 2000. Norms and Values in Law and Economics. In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (I). Ed. B. BOUCKAERT and G. DE GEEST, 1041-1071. Celtenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
BROWN, WENDY and JANET HALLEY. 2002 Introduction. In Left Legalism/Left Critique. Ed. W. BROWN and J. HALLEY, 1-37. Durham: Duke University Press.
BUGARIC, BOJAN. 2001. Courts As Policy-Makers: Lessons From Transition. Harvard International Law Journal 42: 247-288.
BUSSANI, MAURO, VERNON VALENTINE PALMER and FRANCESCO PARISI. 2003. Liability for Pure Financial Loss in Europe: An Economic Restatement.American Journal of Comparative Law 51: 113-162.
CAIN, MAUREEN. 1994. The Symbol Traders. In M. CAIN and C. HARRINGTON, Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression. 15-48. Buckingham: Open University Press.
CALABRESI, GUIDO. 1980. An Exchange. About Law and Economics: A Letter to Ronald Dworkin. Hofstra Law Review 8(3): 553-562.
———. 1982. The New Economic Analysis of Law: Scholarship, Sophistry, or Self-Indulgence? Maccabaean Lecture in Jurisprudence. Proceedings of the British Academy LXVII: 81-108.
CALABRESI, GUIDO and PHILIP BOBBIT. 1978. Tragic Choices. New York: Norton.
CALABRESI, GUIDO, JULES COLEMAN, RONALD DWORKIN, DUNCAN KENNEDY, FRANK MICHELMAN and RICHARD POSNER. 1980. Symposium –Efficiency as a Legal Concern. Hofstra Law Review 8(3): 485-770.
CARBONNIER, JEAN. 1992. Flexible droit. Pour une sociologie du droit dans sans rigueur. 7th edn. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.
CARRINO, AGOSTINO. 1998. Reflections on Legal Science, Law, and Power. In Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Ed. S. L. PAULSON and B. LITSCHEWSKI PAULSON, 507-522. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
CARTER, COOLIDGE JAMES. 1890. The Ideal and the Actual in the Law. American Law Review 24: 752-778.
CHRISTIE, C. GEORGE. 1987. Dworkin’s “Empire”. Duke Law Journal 1987: 157-189.
CHRISTIE, C. GEORGE and PATRICK H. MARTIN. 1995. Jurisprudence. Text and Readings on the Philosophy of Law. 2nd edn. St. Paul, MINN: West Publishing Company.
COASE, RONALD H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1-44.
COHEN, S. FELIX. 1931. The Ethical Basis of Legal Criticism. Yale Law Journal 41: 201-220.
———. 1935. Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach. Columbia Law Review 35: 809-849.
———. 1937. The Problems of a Functional Jurisprudence. Modern Law Review 1: 1-26.
COHEN, JULIUS. 1978. The Political Element in Legal Theory: A Look at Kelsen’s Pure Theory. Yale Law Journal 88(1): 1-38.
COLEMAN, L. JULES. 1982. The Normative Basis of Economic Analysis: A Critical Review of Richard Posner’s The Economics of Justice. Stanford Law Review 34(5): 1105-1131.
———. 1991. Rules and Social Facts. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 14: 703-725.
———. 1998. Second Thoughts and Other First Impressions. In Analyzing Law. New Essays in Legal Theory. Ed. B. BIX, 257-322. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 2003. The Practice of Principle. In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
COLEMAN, L. JULES and BRIAN LEITER. 1993. Determinacy, Objectivity, and Authority. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142: 549-637.
COLOMBO, J. RONALD. 2007. Buy, Sell, or Hold? Analyst Fraud from Economic and Natural Law Perspectives. Hofstra University Legal Studies Research Paper 07-7: 1-74.
COOK, WHEELER WALTER. 1937. ‘Facts’ and ‘Statements of Fact’. University of Chicago Law Review 4: 233-246.
COTTERRELL, ROGER. 1992. The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. 2nd edn. London:Butterworths.
———. 1995. Law’s Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1998. Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society 25: 171-192.
———. 1998. Law and Community: A New Relationship? Current Legal Problems 51: 367-391.
———. 2003. The Politics of Jurisprudence. A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CRENSHAW, KIMBERLÉ. 1988. Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law. Harvard Law Review 101:1331-1387.
DAHL, ROBERT A. 1984. Modern Political Analysis. 5th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall International.
DALTON, L. HARLON. 1995. The Clouded Prism: Minority Critique of the Critical Legal Studies Movement. In Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement. Ed. K. CRENSHAW, N. GOTANDA, G. PELLER and K. THOMAS, 80-84. New York: New Press.
DELACROIX, SYLVIE. 2004. Hart’s and Kelsen’s Concepts of Normativity Contrasted. Ratio Juris 17: 501-520.
DUXBURY, NEIL. 1993. The Theory and History of American Law and Politics. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13: 249-270.
———. 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
DWORKIN, RONALD. 1980. Is Wealth a Value? Journal of Legal Studies 9: 191-226.
———. 1980. Why Efficiency? A Response to Professors Calabresi and Posner. Hofstra Law Review 8(3): 563-590.
———. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1997. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1997. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2006. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2006. Is Democracy Possible Here? Principle for A New Political Debate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
EASTERBROOK, H. FRANK. 2002. Do Liberals and Conservatives Differ in Judicial Activism?. University of Colorado Law Review 73: 1401-1416.
EASTON, DAVID. 1979. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
EHRLICH, ISAAC and RICHARD A. POSNER. 1974. An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking. Journal of Legal Studies III: 257-286.
EKELÖF, PER OLOF. 1958. Teleological Construction of Statutes. Scandinavian Studies in Law 2: 75-117.
ELLICKSON, C. ROBERT. 2000. Taming Leviathan: Will the Centralizing tide of the Twentieth Century Carry into the Twenty-first? Southern California Law Review 74: 101-118.
ENDICOTT, A. O. TIMOTHY. 2002. Law and Language. In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Ed. J. L. COLEMAN and S. SHAPIRO, 935-968. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ESKRIDGE, N. WILLIAM and PHILIP P. FRICKEY. 1994. The Making of the Legal Process. Harvard Law Review 107: 2031-2055.
EVAN, M. WILLIAM. 1990. Social Structure and Law: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. London: Sage Publications.
FARBER, A. DANIEL and PHILIP P. FRICKEY. 1999. Law and Public Choice: A Critical Introduction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
FEREJOHN, JOHN. 2002. Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law. Law and Contemporary Problems 65: 41-68.
FINNIS, JOHN. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1984. The Authority of Law in the Predicament of Contemporary Social Theory. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 1: 115-137.
———. 1985. On ‘Positivism’ and ‘Legal Rational Authority’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 5: 74-90.
———. 1985. On ‘The Critical Legal Studies Movement’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 30: 21-42.
———. 1989. Law as Co-ordination. Ratio Juris 2: 97-104.
———. 1992. Natural Law and Legal Reasoning. In Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Ed. R. P. GEORGE, 134-157. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1996. The Truth in Legal Positivism. In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Ed. R. P. GEORGE, 195-214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 1998. Public Reason, Abortion, and Cloning. Valparaiso University Law Review 32: 361-382.
———. 1999. Abortion and health care ethics. In Bioethics: An Anthology. Ed. H. KUHSE and P. SINGER, 13-20. London: Blackwell.
———. 2000. On the Incoherence of Legal Positivism. Notre Dame Law Review 75: 1597-1611.
FISS, M. OWEN. 1986. The Death of the Law? Cornell Law Review 72(1): 1-16.
FRÄNDBERG, ÅKE. 1999. Interpretation of Statutes –the Use and Weight of travaux préparatoires in Sweden. In Anglo-Swedish Studies in Law. Ed. M. ANDENAS and N. JAREBORG, 208-219. Uppsala: Iustus Förlag.
FRANK, N. JEROME. 1949. Law and the Modern Mind. London: Stevens & Sons.
———. 1950. Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
FREEMAN, D. A. MICHAEL. 2001. Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 7th edn. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
FRIEDMAN, M. LAWRENCE. 1986. The Limits of Law: A Critique and a Proposal. Siegen: Center for Studies on Changing Norms and Mobility.
———. 1986. Legal Culture and the Welfare State. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 13-27. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 2003. Introduction. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4: 438-450. FRIEDMANN, WOLFGANG. 1967. Legal Theory. 5th edn. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 1972. Law in a Changing Society. 2nd edn. London: Stevens & Sons.
FULLER, L. LON. 1949. The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Harvard Law Review 62(4): 616-645.
———. 1958. Positivism and Fidelity to Law –A Reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review 71(4): 630-672.
———. 1958. Human Purpose and Natural Law. Natural Law Forum 3: 68-76.
———. 1958. A Rejoinder to Professor Nagel. Natural Law Forum 3: 83-104.
———. 1969. The Morality of Law. Revised Edition. London: Yale University Press.
GABEL, PETER and JAY M. FEINMAN. 1998. Contract Law as Ideology. In The Politics of Law. A Progressive Critique. 3rd edn. Ed. D. KAIRYS, 497-510. New York: Basic Books.
GABEL, PETER and PAUL HARRIS. 1982. Building Power and Breaking Images: Critical Legal Theory and the Practice of Law. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 11(3): 369-411.
GEORGE, P. ROBERT. 1989. Human Flourishing as a Criterion of Morality: a Critique of Perry’s Naturalism. Tulane Law Review 63: 1455-1474.
GLENDON, MARY ANN. 1987. Abortion and Divorce in Western Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
GLICKSMAN, ROBERT and CHRISTOPHER H. SCHROEDER. 1991. EPA and the Courts: Twenty Years of Law and Politics. Law and Contemporary Problems 54: 249-310.
GOLDSWORTHY, JEFFREY. 1996. Fact and Value in the New Natural Law Theory. American Journal of Jurisprudence 41: 21-46.
GOODRICH, PETER. 1984. Rhetoric as Jurisprudence: An Introduction to the Politics of Legal Language. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4: 88-122.
———. 1987. Legal Discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis.London: MacMillan.
GORDON, W. ROBERT. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36: 57-125.
———. 1985. ‘Of Law and the River,’ and of Nihilism and Academic Freedom. Journal of Legal Education 35: 1-16.
———. 2001 [1988]. Law and Ideology. In M. D. A. FREEMAN, Lloyd’s Introductionto Jurisprudence. 7th edn. 1056-1063. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
———. 2003. A New Role for Lawyers? The Corporate Counselor after Enron. Connecticut Law Review 35: 1185-1217.
GRANOVETTER, MARK. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481-510.
GRAY, JOHN CHIPMAN. 1909. The Nature and Sources of the Law. New York: Columbia University Press.
GREY, C. THOMAS. 2003. Judicial Review and Legal Pragmatism. Wake Forest Law Review 38: 473-511.
HABERMAS, JÜRGEN. 1986. Law as Medium and Law as Institution. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 203-220. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 1998. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
HACKNEY, R. JAMES. 1997 Law and Neoclassical Economics: Science, Politics, and the Reconfiguration of American Tort Law Theory. Law and History Review 15: 275-322.
HAGE, C. JAAP. 2001. Formalizing legal coherence. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Ed. R. P. LOUI, 22-31. New York: ACM.
HÄGERSTRÖM, AXEL. 1965. Recht, Pflicht und bindende Kraft des Vertrages nach römischer und naturrechtlicher Anschauung. Ed. K. OLIVECRONA. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
HARRIS, W. JAMES. 1971. When and why does the Grundnorm change? Cambridge Law Journal 29(1): 103-133.
———. 1981. Olivecrona on Law and Language –The Search for Legal Culture. Tidsskrift för Rettsvitenskap 40: 625-646.
———. 1997. Legal Philosophies. 2nd edn. London: Butterworths.
HART, L. A. HERBERT. 1957. Analytical Jurisprudence in Mid-Twentieth Century: A Reply to Professor Bodenheimer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 105: 953-975.
———. 1958. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. Harvard Law Review 71(4): 593-629.
———. 1959. Scandinavian Realism. Cambridge Law Journal 1959: 233-240.
———. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1972. Abortion Law Reform: The English Experience. Melbourne University Law Review 8: 388-411.
———. 1982. Commands and Authoritative Legal Reasons. In H. L. A. HART, Essays on Bentham. Jurisprudence and Political Theory. 243-268. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1983. Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence. In H. L. A. HART, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. 21-48. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1983. Problems of the Philosophy of Law. In H. L. A. HART, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. 88-119. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1983. Self-referring Laws. In H. L. A. HART, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. 175-178. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1983. American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream. In H. L. A. HART, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. 175-178. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1987. Comment. In Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H. L. A. Hart. Ed. R. GAVISON, 35-42. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1994. Postscript. In H. L. A. HART, The Concept Of Law. 2nd edn. Ed. P. A. Bulloch and J. Raz, 238-276. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1998. Kelsen Visited. In Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Ed. S. L. PAULSON and B. LITSCHEWSKI PAULSON, 69-87. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
HERGET, E. JAMES and STEPHEN WALLACE. 1987. The German Free Law Movement as The Source of American Legal Realism. Virginia Law Review 73: 399-455.
HOBBES, THOMAS. 1985 [1660]. Leviathan. Ed. C. B. MACPHERSON. London: Penguin Books.
HOLMES, W. OLIVER., Jr. 1897. The Path of The Law. Harvard Law Review 10(8): 457-478.
———. 1991. The Common Law. New York: Dover Publications.
HONORÉ, TONY. 1998. The Basic Norm of a Society. In Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Ed. S. L. PAULSON and B. LITSCHEWSKI PAULSON, 89-112. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
HORWITZ, J. MORTON. 1980. Law and Economics: Science or Politics? Hofstra Law Review 8(4): 905-912.
———. 1994. The Transformation of American Law 1870-1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HUNT, ALAN. 1997. The Politics of Law and the Law of Politics. In Law and Power. Critical and Socio-Legal Essays. Ed. K. TUORI, Z. BANKOWSKI, and J. UUSITALI, 51-83. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
HUTCHINSON, C. ALLAN and PATRICK J. MONAHAN. 1984. Law, Politics, and the Critical Legal Scholars: The Unfolding Drama of American Legal Thought. Stanford Law Review 36: 199-246.
JACKSON, H. ROBERT. 1955. The Supreme Court in the American System of Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
JONES, GREG. 2002. Proper Judicial Activism. Regent University Law Review 14: 141-179.
JORI, MARIO 1992. Introduction. In Legal Positivism. Ed. M. JORI, xi-xl. New York: New York University Press.
KAIRYS, DAVID. 1984. Law and Politics. George Washington Law Review 52(2): 243-262.
———. 1998. Introduction. In The Politics of Law. A Progressive Critique. 3rd edn. Ed. D. KAIRYS, 1-20. New York: Basic Books.
KANT, IMMANUEL. 1911 [1781]. Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1 Aufl.). In I. KANT, Kants Werke. Band IV. 1-252. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
KAPLOW, LOUIS and STEVEN SHAVELL. 1994. Why the legal system is less efficient than the income tax in redistributing income. Journal of Legal Studies XXII : 667-681.
KELMAN, LAURA. 1986. Legal Realism at Yale 1927-1960. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
KELMAN, MARK. 1987. A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
KELSEN, HANS. 1925. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Julius Springer.
———. 1929. Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. 2nd edn. TÜBINGEN: J. C. B. Mohr.
———. 1934. Reine Rechtslehre. Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik. Leipzig: Deuticke.
———. 1941. The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review 55: 44-70.
———. 1942. Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution. Journal of Politics 4: 183-200.
———. 1949. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1955. Foundations of Democracy. Ethics LXVI: 1-101.
———. 1955. The Communist Theory of Law. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
———. 1957. What is Justice? In HANS KELSEN, What is Justice? Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science. 1-24. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
———. 1957. Law, State, and Justice in the Pure Theory of Law. In H. KELSEN, What is Justice? Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science. 288-302. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
———. 1957. Science and Politics. In H. KELSEN, What is Justice? Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science. 350-375. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1960. Reine Rechtslehre. 2nd edn. Vienna: Franz Deuticke.
———. 1965. Professor Stone and The Pure Theory of Law. Stanford Law Review 17: 1130-1157.
———. 1966. On The Pure Theory Of Law. Israel Law Review 1(1): 1-7.
———. 1970. The Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1970. Über Grenzen zwischen juristischer und soziologischer Methode. Aalen: Scientia Verlag.
———. 1986. The Function of a Constitution. In Essays on Kelsen. Ed. R. TUR and W. TWINING, 109-122. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1991. General Theory of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1996 [1934]. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1998. ‘Foreword’ to Main Problems in the Theory of Public Law. In Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Ed. S. L. PAULSON and B. LITSCHEWSKI PAULSON, 3-22. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
KENNEDY, DUNCAN. 1976. Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89: 1685-1778.
———. 1979. The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries. Buffalo Law Review 28: 205-382.
———. 1982. Legal Education as Training for Hierarchy. In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique 46-48. Ed. D. KAIRYS, 40-62. New York: Pantheon.
KLARE, E. KARL. 2001. The Politics of Duncan Kennedy’s Critique. Cardozo Law Review 22: 1073-1104.
KOZINSKI, ALEX. 1993. What I Ate for Breakfast And Other Mysteries Of Judicial Decision Making. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 26: 993-999.
KRAMER, MATTHEW. 2000. How Moral Principles Can Enter Into The Law. Legal Theory 6(1): 83-108.
———. 2004. Where Law and Morality Meet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KRAWIETZ, WERNER. 2001. The Concept of Law Revised –Directives and Norms in the Perspectives of a New Legal Realism. Ratio Juris 14(1): 34-46.
KRONMAN, T. ANTHONY. 1988. Jurisprudential Responses to Legal Realism. Cornell Law Review 73: 335-340.
LASSWELL, D. HAROLD. 1958. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Meridian Books, Inc.
LEFF, A. ARTHUR. 1974. Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism. Virginia Law Review 60: 451-482.
LEITER, BRIAN. 1996. Legal Realism. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Ed. D. PATTERSON, 261-279. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1997. Is There An “American” Jurisprudence? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17: 367-387.
———. 1997. Rethinking Legal Realism: Toward a Naturalized Jurisprudence. Texas Law Review 76(2): 267-315.
———. 1999. Positivism, Formalism, Realism. Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. By ANTHONY SEBOK. Columbia Law Review 99: 1138-1164.
———. 2001. Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered. Ethics 111: 278-301.
———. 2001. Legal Realism, Hard Positivism, and the Limits of Conceptual Analysis. In Hart’s Postscript. Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Ed. J. COLEMAN, 355-370. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LEVI, EDWARD HIRSCH. 1959. The Political, The Professional, and The Prudent in Legal Education. Journal of Legal Education 11: 457-469.
LLEWELLYN, N. KARL. 1930. A Realistic Jurisprudence –The Next Step. Columbia Law Review 30: 431-465.
———. 1931. Some Realism about Realism. Harvard Law Review 44: 1222-1264.
———. 1935. On What Is Wrong With So-Called Legal Education. Columbia Law Review 35(5): 651-678.
———. 1940. On Reading and Using the Newer Jurisprudence. Columbia LawReview 40: 581-614.
———. 1941. My Philosophy of Law. In My Philosophy of Law. Credos of Sixteen American Scholars. 181-197. Boston, MA: Boston Law Book.
———. 1941. The Theory of Legal “Science”. North Carolina Law Review 20: 1-23.
———. 1949. Law and The Social Sciences –Especially Sociology. Harvard LawReview 62: 1286-1305.
———. 1950. Remarks On The Theory Of Appellate Decision And The Rules or Canons About How Statutes Are To Be Construed. Vanderbilt Law Review 3: 395-406.
———. 1960. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
———. 1971. American Common Law Tradition, and American Democracy. In K. LLEWELLYN, Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice. 282-315. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
———. 1996. Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.
LUHMANN, NIKLAS 1985. A sociological theory of law. Ed. M. ALBROW. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
———. 1986. The Self-Reproduction of Law and its Limits. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 111-127. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 1988. Closure and Openness: On Reality in the World of Law. In Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 335-348. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 1988. The Unity of the Legal System. In Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 12-35. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 1989. Law as a Social System. Northwestern University Law Review 83: 136-150.
———. 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LUNDSTEDT, A. VILHELM. 1925. Superstition or Rationality in Action for Peace? Arguments Against Founding a World Peace on the Common Sense of Justice. A Criticism of Jurisprudence. London: Longmans, Green & Company.
———. 1932. Die Unwissenschaftlichkeit der Rechtswissenschaft, vol. I. Die falschen Vorstellungen von objektivem Recht und subjektiven Rechten. Berlin:Verlag für Staatswissenschaften und Geschichte.
———. 1936. Die Unwissenschaftlichkeit der Rechtswissenschaft, vol. II-I. Strafrecht, Vertragsrecht, Deliktische Haftung. Berlin: Verlag für Staatswissenschaften und Geschichte.
———. 1956. Legal Thinking Revised: My Views on Law. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
LYONS, DAVID. 1984. Justification and Judicial Responsibility. California Law Review 72: 178-199.
MACCORMICK, D. NEIL. 1973. Legal Obligation and the Imperative Fallacy. In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Second Series). Ed. A.W.B. SIMPSON, 100-130. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1981. H.L.A. Hart. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
———. 1981. Natural Law Reconsidered. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1: 99-109.
———. 1985. A Moralistic Case for A-Moralistic Law? Valparaiso University Law Review 20(1): 1-41.
———. 1994. The Concept of Law and ‘The Concept of Law’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 14: 1-23.
———. 1997. Institutional Normative Order: A Conception of Law. Cornell Law Review 82: 1051-1070.
———. 1997. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MACCORMICK, D. NEIL and OTA WEINBERGER. 1986. Introduction. In N. D. MACCORMICK and O. WEINBERGER, An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism. 2-12. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
MACHIAVELLI, NICCOLÒ. 1908 [1532]. The Prince. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.
MARTIN, MICHAEL. 1997. Legal Realism: American and Scandinavian. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
MARX, KARL. 2002 [1859]. Preface to A Critique of Political Economy. In Karl Marx: Selected Writings. 2nd edn. Ed. D. MCLELLAN, 424-428. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MCCOUBREY, HILAIRE and NIGEL D. WHITE. 1999. Textbook on Jurisprudence. 3rd edn. London: Blackstone Press Limited.
MENSCH, ELIZABETH. 1998. The History of Mainstream Legal Thought. In The Politics of Law. A Progressive Critique. 3rd edn. Ed. D. KAIRYS, 23-53. New York: Basic Books.
MERKL, ADOLF. 1931. Hans Kelsen als Verfassungspolitiker. Juristische Blätter 60: 385–387.
MÖLLERS, CHRISTOPH. 2004. The politics of law and the law of politics: two constitutional raditions in Europe. In Developing a Constitution for Europe. Eds. E. O. ERIKSEN, J. E. FOSSUM and A. MENÉNDEZ, 129-139. London: Routledge.
MOORE, S. MICHAEL. 1984. The Need for a Theory of Legal Theories: Assessing Pragmatic Instrumentalism. A Review Essay of “Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory” by ROBERT S. SUMMERS. Cornell Law Review 69:988-1013.
———. 2000. Educating Oneself in Public. Critical Essays in Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MOORE, TERRENCE L. 1990. Critical Legal Studies and Anglo-American Jurisprudence. United States Air Force Academy Journal of Legal Studies 1:1-21.
MORESO, JOSÉ JUAN and PABLO E. NAVARRO. 1998. The Reception of Norms, and Open Legal Systems. In Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Ed. S. L. PAULSON and B. LITSCHEWSKI PAULSON, 273-291. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MURPHY, G. JEFFRIE and JULES L. COLEMAN. 1984. The Philosophy of Law. An Introduction to Jurisprudence. Totowa, NJ : Rowman & Allanheld.
MURPHY, LIAM. 2001. The Political Question of the Concept of Law. In Hart’s Postscript. Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Ed. J. COLEMAN, 371-409. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
NINO, CARLOS SANTIAGO. 1998. Some Confusions surrounding Kelsen’s Concept of Validity. In Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Ed. S. L. PAULSON and B. LITSCHEWSKI PAULSON, 253-261. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
NONET, PHILIPPE and PHILIP SELZNICK. 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper.
NOTE. 1982. ‘Round and ‘Round the Bramble Bush: from Legal Realism to Critical Legal Scholarship. Harvard Law Review 95: 1669-1690.
NOTES. 1979. The Distinction between the Normative and Formal Functions of Law in H.L.A. Hart’s The Concept of Law. Virginia Law Review 65: 1359-1382.
O’NEILL, JOHN. 1986. The Disciplinary Society: From Weber to Foucault. The British Journal of Sociology 37: 42-60.
OLIPHANT, HERMAN. 1928. A Return to Stare Decisis. American Bar Association Journal XIV: 71-163.
OLIVECRONA, H. KARL. 1939. Law as Fact. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
———. 1941. England oder Deutschland? Lübeck: Reichskontor der Nordischen Gesellschaft –W. Limpert Verlagshaus.
———. 1946. Das Werden eines Königs nach altschwedischem Recht. Der Königsritus als magischer Akt. Lund: Lunds Universitets årsskrift.
———. 1951. Realism and Idealism: Some Reflections on the Cardinal Point in Legal Philosophy. New York University Law Review 26: 120-131.
———. 1962. Legal Language and Reality. In Essays in Jurisprudence in Honor of Roscoe Pound. Ed. R. A. NEWMAN, 151-191. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Hill Co.
———. 1964. The Imperative Element in the Law. Rutgers Law Review 18: 794-810.
———. 1965. Domstolar och tvistemål: En första bok i processrätt. Lund: Gleerup.
———. 1971. Law as Fact. 2nd edn. London: Stevens & Sons.
———. 1978. Bentham’s “veil of mystery.” Current Legal Problems 31: 227-237.
ORTS, W. ERIC. 1995. Reflexive Environmental Law. Northwestern University Law Review 98: 1227-1320.
PAQUET, GILLES and PIERRE M. PESTIEAU. 1999. Economics and Law. In The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia. Ed. G. B. GRAY, 246-248. New York: Garland Publishing.
PARISI, FRANCESCO and JONATHAN KLICK. 2004. Functional Law and Economics: The Search for Value-Neutral Principles of Lawmaking. Chicago-Kent Law Review 79(2): 431-450.
PAULSON, L. STANLEY. 1992. Kelsen’s Legal Theory: the Final Round. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12: 265-274.
———. 1996. Appendix I: Supplementary Notes. In H. KELSEN, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. 127-137. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1996. Hans Kelsen’s Earliest Legal Theory: Critical Constructivism. Modern Law Review 59: 797-812.
PECZENIK, ALEKSANDER. 1972. The Concept of ‘Valid Law’. Scandinavian Studies In Law 16: 213-251.
PERRY, R. STEPHEN. 2001. Hart’s Methodological Positivism. In Hart’s Postscript. Essays to the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Ed. J. COLEMAN, 311-354. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2006. Hart on Social Rules and the Foundations of Law: Liberating the Internal Point of View. Fordham Law Review 75: 1171-1209.
PESTRITTO, J. RONALD. 2000. Founding the Criminal Law: Punishment and Political Thought in the Origins of America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
POSNER, A. RICHARD. 1975. The Economic Approach to Law. Texas Law Review 53: 757-782.
———. 1979. Some Uses and Abuses of Economics in Law. University of Chicago Law Review 46: 281-306.
———. 1979. Utilitarianism, Economics and Legal Theory. Journal of Legal Studies 8: 103-140.
———. 1980. The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication. Hofstra Law Review 8(3): 487-507.
———. 1983. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1986. Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution. Case Western Reserve Law Review 37(2): 179-217.
———. 1987. The Law and Economics Movement. The American Economic Review 77: 1-13.
———. 1987. The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline: 1962-1987. Harvard Law Review 100: 761-780.
———. 1990. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1990. Law and Economics Is Moral. Valparaiso University Law Review, 24: 163-174.
———. 1992. Economic Analysis of Law. 4th edn. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
———. 1996. Pragmatic Adjudication. Cardozo Law Review 18: 1-20.
———. 2002. Legal Scholarship Today. Harvard Law Review 115: 1314-1326.
POSTEMA, GERALD. 1987. The Normativity of Law. In Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H. L. A. Hart. Ed. R. GAVISON, 81-104. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
POUND, ROSCOE. 1910. Law in Books and Law in Action. American Law Review 44: 12-36.
PREUSS, K. ULRICH. 1986. The Concept of Rights and the Welfare State. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 151-172. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
PRIEL, DANNY. 2005. Farewell to the Exclusive-Inclusive Debate. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25: 675-696.
RAZ, JOSEPH. 1971. The Identity of Legal Systems. California Law Review 59: 795-815.
———. 1973. On The Functions of Law. In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Second Series). Ed. A. W. B. SIMPSON, 278-304. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1974. Kelsen’s Theory of The Basic Norm. American Journal of Jurisprudence 19: 94-111.
———. 1979. Legal Positivism and the Sources of Law. In J. RAZ, The Authority of Law. Essays on Law and Morality. 37-52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 1980. The Concept of A Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1984. Hart on Moral Rights and Legal Duties. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4: 123-131.
———. 1985. The Morality of Obedience. A Review of Soper “A Theory of Law”. Michigan Law Review 83: 732-749.
———. 1986. The Purity of the Pure Theory. In Essays on Kelsen. Ed. R. TUR and W. TWINING, 79-97. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1994. Authority, Law, and Morality. In J. RAZ, Ethics in The Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, 194-221. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1994. Government by Consent. In J. RAZ, Ethics in The Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, 339-353. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1994. The Problem about the Nature of Law. In J. RAZ, Ethics in The Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, 179-193. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1994. The Inner Logic of Law. In J. RAZ, Ethics in The Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, 222-237. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1994. Rights and Individual Well-Being, In J. RAZ, Ethics in The Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, 29-44. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1994. On The Autonomy of Legal Reasoning. In J. RAZ, Ethics in The Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, 310-324. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1998. Disagreement in Politics. American Journal of Jurisprudence 43: 25-52.
———. 2001. Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial Comparison. In Hart’s Postscript. Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Ed. J. COLEMAN, 1-37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
REIMAN, MATHIAS. 1989. The Historical School against Codification: Savigny, Carter, and the Defeat of the New York Civil Code. American Journal of Comparative Law 37: 95-120.
RIFKIN, JANET. 1980. Toward a Theory of Law and Patriarchy. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 3: 83-96.
ROBINSON, WILLIAM. 2007. Polishing what others have written: the role of the European Commission’s legal revisers in drafting European Community legislation. Loophole. Journal of the Commonwealth Association of Legislative Counsel 71-81 (2007).
RÖMKENS, RENÈE. 2001. Law as Trojan Horse: Unintended Consequences of Right-Bases Interventions to Support Battered Women. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 13: 265-291.
ROSS, ALF. 1946. Towards a Realistic Jurisprudence. A Criticism of the Dualism in Law. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
———. 1952. Why Democracy? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1957. Tû-tû. Harvard Law Review 70: 812-825.
———. 1958. On Law and Justice. London: Stevens & Sons.
———. 1959. Dansk statsforfatningsret. 1. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
———. 1962. The Concept of Law. By H. L. A. HART. Yale Law Journal 71: 1185-1190.
———. 1968. Directives and Norms. London: Routledge & Kegan.
———. 1969. Legal Fictions. In Law, Reason, and Justice. Essays in Legal Philosophy. Ed. G. HUGHES, 217-234. New York: New York University Press.
ROWLEY, K. CHARLES. 1998. Wealth Maximization in Normative Law and Economics: A Social Choice Analysis. George Mason Law Review 6: 971-996.
RUBIN, L. EDWARD. 1988. The Practice and Discourse of Legal Scholarship. Michigan Law Review 86: 1835-1905.
RUBIN, H. PAUL. 1977. Why is Common Law Efficient? Journal of Legal Studies VI: 51-63.
RUGGIE, MARY. 1992. The Paradox of Liberal Intervention: Health Policy and the American Welfare State. American Journal of Sociology 97: 919-944.
RUMBLE, E. WILFRID. 1964. American Legal Realism and the Reduction of Uncertainty. Journal of Public Law 13: 45-75.
———. 1968. American Legal Realism: Skepticism, Reform, and the Judicial Process. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
SABINE, H. GEORGE. 1964. A History of Political Theory. 3rd edn. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
SARTORIUS, ROLF. 1971. Hart’s Concept of Law. In More Essays in Legal Philosophy. Ed. R. SUMMERS, 131-161. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
SAVIGNY, FREDRICH CARL (VON). 1814. Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.
———. 1979 [1867]. System of the Modern Roman Law. Westport, Conn.: Hyperion Press.
SCALIA, ANTONIN. 1989. The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules. University of Chicago Law Review 56(4): 1175-1188.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK. 1982. An Essay on Constitutional Language. UCLA Law Review 29: 797-832.
———. 1993. Constitutional Positivism. Connecticut Law Review 25: 797-828.
SCHMIDT, FOLKE. 1978. The Uppsala School of Legal Thinking. Scandinavian Studies in Law 22: 149-175.
SCHMITT, CARL. 1928. Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
SEBOK, J. ANTHONY. 1995. Misunderstanding Positivism. Michigan Law Review 93: 2054-2132.
SHAPIRO, J. SCOTT. 2006. What Is The Internal Point of View? Fordham Law Review 75: 1157-1170.
SHIVAKUMAR, DHANANJAI. 1996. The Pure Theory as Ideal Type: Defending Kelsen on the Basis of Weberian Methodology. Yale Law Journal 105: 1383-1414.
SIMPSON, A. W. BRIAN. 1981. The Rise and Fall of the Legal Treatise: Legal Principles and the Forms of Legal Literature. University of Chicago Law Review 48: 632-679.
SINGER, JOSEPH WILLIAM. 1988. Legal Realism Now. California Law Review 76: 465-544.
SKINNER, QUENTIN. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SMITH, ADAM, 1978 [1766]. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Ed. R. L. MEEK, D. D. RAPHAEL and P. G. STEIN. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SOPER, E. PHILIP. 1992. Some Natural Confusions About Natural Law. Michigan Law Review 90: 2394-2423.
SPAAK, TORBEN. 2003. Legal Positivism, Law’s Normativity, and the Normative Force of Legal Justification. Ratio Juris 16(4): 469-485.
STANDEN, A. JEFFREY. 1986. Critical Legal Studies As An Anti-Positivist Phenomenon. Virginia Law Review 72: 983-998.
STEIN, PETER and JOHN SHAND. 1974. Legal Values in Western Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
STONE, JULIUS. 1964. Legal System and Lawyers’ Reasoning. London: Stevens and Sons.
SUMMERS, S. ROBERT. 1982. Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
———. 1984. On Identifying And Reconstructing A General Legal Theory – Some Thoughts Prompted By Professor Moore’s Critique. Cornell LawReview 69: 1014-1046.
———. 2000. Law as a Type of “Machine” Technology. In R. S. SUMMERS, Essays in Legal Theory. 43-54. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
———. 2000. My Philosophy of Law. In R. S. SUMMERS, Essays in Legal Theory. 95-123. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
SUNDBERG, JACOB. 1983. Hägerström and Finland’s Struggle for Law. Littleton, CO: Rothman.
———. 1986. Scandinavian Unrealism: Co-report on Scandinavian Legal Philosophy. Rechtstheorie 9: 307-321.
———. 1990. Från Eddan till Ekelöf. 2nd edn. Stockholm: Institutet för offentligoch internationell rätt –Juristförlaget.
TAEKEMA, SANNE. 2003. The Concept of Ideals in Legal Theory. London: Kluwer Law International.
TAMANAHA, Z. BRIAN. 2007. How an Instrumental View of Law Corrodes the Rule of Law. DePaul Law Review 56: 469-505.
TEUBNER, GUNTHER. 1983. Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law. Law and Society Review 17: 239-286.
———. 1986. The Transformation of Law in the Welfare State. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 3-10. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 1987. Juridification –Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. In Juridification of Social Spheres: A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labor, Corporate, Anti-Trust and Social Welfare. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 3-48. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 1988. Introduction to Autopoietic Law. In Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Ed. G. TEUBNER, 1-11. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
———. 1989. How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law. Law and Society Review 23: 727-757.
———. 1993. Law as an Autopoietic System. Ed. Z. Bankowski. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1996. Altera Pars Audiatur: Law in the Collision of Discourses. In Law, Society and Economy. Centenary Essays for the London School of Economics and Political Science 1895-1995. Ed. R. RAWLINGS, 149-176. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1997. The King’s Many Bodies: The Self-Deconstruction of Law’s Hierarchy. Law and Society Review 31: 763-787.
THURMAN, W. ARNOLD. 1936. Institute Priests and Yale Observers –A Reply to Dean Goodrich. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 84: 811-824.
TRUBEK, M. DAVID. 1984. Where the action is: Critical Legal Studies and empiricism. Stanford Law Review 36: 575-622.
TUORI, KAARLO. 2002. Critical Legal Positivism. Adelshot: Ashgate.
———. 2006. Self-Description And External Description Of The Law. No Foundations: Journal of Extreme Legal Positivism 2: 27-43.
TUSHNET, V. MARK. 1987. The Supreme Court as Communicator: Carter’s ‘Contemporary Constitutional Lawmaking’. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1987: 225-231.
———. 1987. Comment on Cox. Maryland Law Review 47: 147-154.
TWINING, WILLIAM. 1973. Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
———. 1973. The Bad Man Revisited. Cornell Law Review 58: 275-303.
———. 1985. Talk about Realism. New York University Law Review 60(3): 329-384.
———. 2000. Globalisation and Legal Theory. London: Butterworths.
UNGER, ROBERTO MANGABEIRA. 1982. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Harvard Law Review 96: 561-675.
———. 1996. Legal Analysis as Institutional Imagination. In Law, Society and Economy. Centenary Essays for the London School of Economics and Political Science 1895-1995. Ed. R. RAWLINGS, 177-206. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
VAGO, STEVEN. 2000. Law and Society. 6th edn. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
VAN HOECKE, MARK. 2002. Law as Communication. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
VARGA, CSABA. 1994. Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. In C. VARGA, Law and Philosophy. Selected Papers in Legal Theory. 289-293. Budapest: Faculty of Law of Lórand Eötvös University.
———. 1994. Logic of Law and Judicial Activity: A Gap Between Ideals, Reality and Future Perspectives. In C. VARGA, Law and Philosophy. Selected Papers in Legal Theory. 257-288. Budapest: Faculty of Law of Lórand Eötvös University.
———. 1994. Law As A Social Issue. In C. VARGA, Law and Philosophy. Selected Papers in Legal Theory. 459-475. Budapest: Faculty of Law of Lórand: Eötvös University.
VEILLEUX, JOHN. 1987. The Scientific Model in Law. Georgetown Law Journal 75: 1967-2003.
VINK, EDWARD and EDWARD VEITCH. 1977. Curricular Reform in Canada. Journal of Legal Education 28: 437-484.
VOGEL, HANS-HEINRICH. 1972. Der skandinavischer Rechtsrealismus. Frankfurt am Main: Metzner Verlag.
VYSCHINSKY, Y. ANDREI. 1951. The Fundamental Tasks of the Science of Soviet Socialist Law. In Soviet Legal Philosophy. 303-341. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
WALDRON, JEREMY. 1996. Legislation, Authority, and Voting. Georgetown Law Journal 84: 2185-2214.
———. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2000. “Transcendental Nonsense” and System of Law. Columbia Law Review 100: 16-53.
WALUCHOW, J. WILFRID. 1989. The Weak Social Thesis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9(1): 23-55.
———. 1994. Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 2000. Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defense of Inclusive Legal Positivism. Legal Theory 6: 45-81.
WARD, IAN. 1992. Law, Philosophy and National Socialism. Heidegger, Schmitt and Radbruch in Context. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
WATSON, ALAN. 1991. Roman Law & Comparative Law. London: The University of Georgia Press.
WEBER, MAX. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Ed. H. H. GERTH and C. WRIGHT MILLS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.